Blog

Being pulled over by the police is something most drivers in San Diego have experienced at least once. Whether it’s for a broken taillight or going a few miles over the speed limit, traffic stops can quickly go from routine to stressful. But what happens when that stop crosses a line? What if an officer goes too far or treats you differently because of how you look or where you’re from?

Knowing your rights during a traffic stop isn’t just helpful; it can protect you from actions that should never happen in the first place. Across San Diego, people report situations where traffic stops have turned into something more – unlawful searches, unfair treatment, or even physical intimidation. This shouldn’t be the norm. It’s important to understand where your rights begin and where law enforcement must stop.

Common Civil Rights Violations During Traffic Stops

Ostensibly, every officer pulling someone over has rules to follow:

• The stop has to be legal;
• Their conduct must stay within legal limits;
• The person’s rights don’t disappear just because they’re on the side of the road.

When those boundaries are crossed, those acts can constitute a civil rights violation.

Some of the most common civil rights violations during traffic stops include:

• Unlawful Searches: An officer can’t just open your car doors or search your backseat without permission or probable cause. If they go through your vehicle without a warrant or good reason, it could be a violation.
• Racial Profiling: Getting pulled over purely because of your race, ethnicity, or background is serious. If, for example, multiple drivers are speeding but only one driver, who’s a person of color, gets stopped, it raises red flags.
• Excessive Force: Officers are only supposed to use force when there’s a true threat or resistance. If you’re cooperating and still face aggressive actions, that’s not acceptable.
• Prolonged Detention Without Cause: Officers are not allowed to detain drivers indefinitely without a valid reason. Once the original reason for the stop has been handled, they can’t continue holding you just to look for something else.

When something feels wrong during or after a traffic stop, there’s a good chance your instincts are right. That doesn’t always mean it’s illegal, but it could mean your rights were ignored or stretched too far.

Your Rights During A Traffic Stop

Police may have authority, but that doesn’t erase your rights. Even on the side of the road, you’re protected by the law. In the middle of a tense stop, it’s easy to forget what you can and can’t do, especially if things feel hostile or intimidating.

Here are a few things to keep in mind:

1. You Have the Right to Remain Silent

You don’t have to answer questions like “Where are you headed?” or “Where have you been?” Politely telling the officer, “I choose to remain silent,” is enough.

2. You Can Refuse a Vehicle Search

Without a warrant, your permission, or clear probable cause, an officer can’t legally search your car. You can clearly and politely say, “I do not consent to a search.”

3. You Can Ask Why You Were Pulled Over

You’re allowed to know the reason for the stop. Ask, “Can you tell me why I was pulled over?” or “Am I being detained, or am I free to go?”

4. You Can Record the Interaction

Recording traffic stops is legal in California as long as you’re not interfering. Keep your hands visible and avoid sudden movements while recording.

5. You Have the Right to Stay Calm

No matter how unfair or uncomfortable things get, keeping calm can help you think clearly and avoid unnecessary escalation. If you’re arrested, keep asking for a lawyer and stop talking.

Staying aware of your rights can be the difference between feeling powerless or prepared. Even if you’re unsure exactly what laws apply, remembering these basics can help you stay in control.

How to Handle a Violation

If your rights were violated during a traffic stop in San Diego, things can feel confusing or overwhelming right after it happens. You might not know whether what happened was illegal or how to respond – but there are steps you can take to protect yourself.

Start with the details. As soon as you’re safe, write down everything you remember:

– Time, date, and exact location of the stop
– Officer’s name, badge number, and agency
– What happened during the stop, including what was said
– Whether anything was taken or damaged
– Names and numbers of any witnesses

If you have a recording of the stop, back it up somewhere safe right away. Don’t cut, edit, or change the video – even if some parts seem irrelevant.

Next, focus on your personal well-being. If you were physically harmed, get checked by a doctor. If you’re dealing with emotional stress, document that too – your mental state matters just as much as your physical health.

You can also file a complaint with the agency involved. Whether it was the San Diego Police Department or the California Highway Patrol, every entity has a process. Putting your complaint in writing documents what happened and adds pressure to take it seriously.

Next, talk to an attorney. A legal professional can look at everything and help you figure out whether it’s worth filing a lawsuit. Sometimes the best resolution is a formal complaint. Other times, moving forward with legal action might be the right choice. Having someone knowledgeable in your corner makes all the difference.

Why a San Diego Civil Rights Lawyer Matters

Handling a legal issue on your own is tough. Once a traffic stop crosses into civil rights violation territory, the process of filing complaints or lawsuits is anything but simple. Laws vary, deadlines matter, and missing a step can damage your case.

A San Diego civil rights lawyer understands how to build cases around these types of violations. They can help gather statements, preserve evidence, and speak on your behalf so you don’t have to track every form or deadline.

Here’s what a legal expert can usually do to assist in traffic stop cases:

– Review the facts and advise if your rights were likely violated
– Communicate with law enforcement agencies
– Collect evidence, including any recordings, photos, or witness accounts
– File a claim in state or federal court if needed
– Negotiate settlements or speak in court if things move to trial

Civil rights law is detailed and often hard to follow. It helps to have someone who works with these laws every day. That support means you’re not going it alone and that your complaints are heard in the right way by the right people.

Your Rights Matter Every Time You Drive

Traffic stops can go sideways fast. One minute it’s a simple citation. The next thing you know, things have escalated into a use of force. Maybe you’re still shaken hours later, piecing together how things got so out of hand. That’s why it’s important to speak up and act when something doesn’t feel right.

Knowing what you’re allowed to say or do can help you keep calm during the stop and build protections for yourself afterwards. These moments can feel isolating, but you’re not alone (and your concerns matter).

If you believe your rights were ignored or violated during a traffic stop in San Diego, don’t wait to get help. Whether it’s understanding what happened, filing a report, or going to court, support is available. You don’t have to accept poor treatment or stay silent just because the situation has passed.

Real change starts when people stand up for themselves. And sometimes, that stems from a single moment on the side of the road.

When a traffic stop crosses the line, it’s important to have someone who knows how to protect your legal rights. An experienced San Diego civil rights lawyer can help you take the right steps forward and stand up against unfair treatment. Reach out to McKenzie Scott to learn how our team can support you every step of the way.

The question of whether you can film the police while they’re making an arrest is a common one. Many people wonder about their rights in these situations, especially when tensions can run high. It’s important to know that as a citizen, you have the right to record police officers while they are performing their duties in public. This right is part of the protections granted under the First Amendment, which safeguards freedoms crucial to a democratic society. By understanding your rights, you can better protect yourself and help support transparency during these interactions.

Knowing your rights not only protects your freedom but also helps hold law enforcement accountable. Filming can be a useful way to document police behavior, especially if the conduct of officers comes into question later. It’s not uncommon for individuals to face pushback or be intimidated when they record, but understanding your constitutional rights gives you a way to stand firm when needed.

Understanding Your First Amendment Rights

The First Amendment is a foundation of American democracy. It provides protection for your freedom of speech, freedom of the press, and your right to assemble peacefully. When it comes to filming police officers, the First Amendment includes your right to document how officers carry out their duties, as long as you’re in a public space and not interfering with their actions.

Here’s what that means for you:

– You can record what happens in public areas such as sidewalks, streets, or parks without stopping police from doing their job.

– You can share your videos with media sources or online platforms such as X or YouTube.

– You can talk publicly about what you recorded and raise any concerns about what took place.

This basic understanding empowers people to help maintain fairness and transparency. If an officer tells you to stop recording or threatens to arrest you when you’re not breaking any laws, you have every reason to calmly assert your rights. Clear communication can help de-escalate misunderstandings. Making it known that you are aware of your rights might even change the officer’s approach.

Legal Boundaries and Limitations

While the right to film is protected, there are some limits that you need to be aware of. Recorder or not, interfering with law enforcement can result in legal trouble. Being smart about how and where you record can help you stay within your rights while avoiding issues.

Here are a few important things to know:

1. Obstruction: You can’t physically interfere with what the police are doing. If you’re recording, keep a safe distance. Don’t get in the way, don’t argue during an arrest, and don’t create a situation where the officer feels distracted or threatened. Your presence should not stop or delay them from doing their job.

2. Private Property: Filming on private property is a gray area. If you’re on someone else’s land or in a building, you might need permission to film. This includes places like restaurants, apartment buildings, or stores. Even if the police are involved in something there, the property owner’s rules can still apply.

3. Audio Recording Laws: Some states have rules about recording conversations. These laws may require consent from one or all parties involved. Be sure to check your local laws to better understand how they apply where you live.

Knowing these rules will help you stay focused on your goals while minimizing the chance of violating the law. Even though your right to film is protected in many places, keeping these limits in mind is part of staying safe and informed.

How to Safely Film the Police

Once you decide to record something involving law enforcement, how you go about it is important. A calm, respectful approach keeps things from getting worse and allows you to focus on documenting what’s happening.

Here are a few safety tips:

– Stay calm: Don’t get pulled into the emotions around the situation. Keep your voice steady and avoid aggressive body language.

– Keep your distance: If you’re too close to the officers, you’re more likely to be seen as interfering. Filming from the sidewalk or several feet away is usually best.

– Follow police instructions: If you’re asked to move but can safely continue filming from another spot, do it. You don’t have to stop recording, but you do want to avoid confrontation.

– Protect your footage: Lock your phone with a passcode and consider using apps that auto-upload your videos to the cloud. That way, your recordings are saved even if your phone is taken or damaged.

These steps help you avoid unwanted attention and stick to your goal of capturing events without disrupting what’s going on.

Potential Consequences for Police Misconduct

In the event that law enforcement tries to stop you from recording lawfully, they could be crossing the line. Officers who intentionally interfere with your right to film in a public setting might face consequences under civil rights laws.

Here’s what can happen when police step outside legal boundaries:

– Civil Liability: Officers could be held accountable for violating your rights. This could result in civil claims or lawsuits.

– Internal Review: If misconduct is reported and proven, departments may launch investigations. This can lead to officer retraining, discipline, or even job loss depending on the result.

If you feel that your rights have been violated while filming, document what happened. Record the officer’s badge number and name, the time and place of the event, and any witnesses around. Save and backup footage right away. If things escalate, this information may be useful as evidence.

Protect Yourself Through Legal Guidance

Exercising your right to film police is one way to support accountability and stay informed. But understanding what to do next if you’re challenged or intimidated makes a big difference. If you’re ever unsure about something that happened during a police interaction or feel your rights were ignored, talking to a legal expert is a smart next step.

Laws are meant to protect both freedom and public safety. If you ever feel like your ability to record was unfairly targeted, having a professional on your side can make all the difference. Getting informed, knowing your rights, and having the right support can go a long way toward making sure your voice—and actions—are protected.

Understanding your rights is key when dealing with law enforcement encounters. If you ever find yourself needing guidance on police misconduct issues or if your rights have been challenged, reach out to a knowledgeable professional in the field. A conversation with a San Diego police misconduct lawyer at McKenzie Scott can provide valuable insight and support tailored to your situation. Remember, staying informed and prepared ensures your rights are protected under the law.

Watch Video Blog Here:

Most of us have seen those TV shows where a character gets arrested and an officer reads them their rights. You might even know the words by heart: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law…” These are known as Miranda Rights. They’re designed to ensure fair treatment for everyone, but what happens if you’re not read these rights? Knowing how this works is more than just TV drama. It’s something that can matter in real life if you’re ever dealing with law enforcement.

At the core, Miranda Rights are about protecting your Fifth Amendment rights. They come into play during certain encounters with police. Still, not every interaction requires them. Just because you’re not read your rights doesn’t mean your case gets thrown out. There are rules around when the warnings apply and when they don’t. Let’s break down what these rights mean, when they matter, and what you should know to protect yourself.

Understanding Miranda Rights

Miranda Rights came out of a U.S. Supreme Court case called Miranda v. Arizona back in 1966. The goal of the ruling was simple: make sure people know they have a right to remain silent and a right to an attorney before answering any questions from the police.

Here’s what Miranda Rights cover:

– What They Are: A statement given by officers telling you that you have the right to stay silent and talk to a lawyer. If you choose to talk, anything you say might be used in court.

– Why They Exist: To stop people from accidentally giving evidence against themselves when they don’t know their rights.

– When They Matter: These rights aren’t required for every situation. They’re only required if you’re both in custody and being interrogated.

For example, if you’re walking down the street and an officer stops to talk casually, you’re not in custody. Miranda wouldn’t apply. But if you’re handcuffed, inside a patrol car, and being asked questions, that’s different. In that case, they need to advise you of your rights.

The key takeaway here is that both “custody” and “interrogation” must be happening before Miranda Rights need to be read. If one is missing, the rights don’t have to be given at that moment.

Situations Where Miranda Rights Are Not Required

There are times when people assume police should read Miranda Rights, but legally they don’t have to. One common example is a voluntary conversation. If you walk up to a police officer at the park and start talking, that’s on you. You’re not in custody, and no warning is needed. Yet, what you say might still be used in court.

Another situation is when someone is already in custody, like in the back of a police car, but just starts talking without being questioned. If you’re not being asked anything and begin spilling information, that’s considered voluntary. The police are not required to stop you or read your rights before you talk.

There’s a big focus on the idea of interrogation. It’s not just about being in handcuffs. If no one is asking you anything, there is no interrogation. That means whatever you say can still be fair game in court.

Things can also change once you’re in court. Maybe the police collected a statement without reading rights, and they didn’t use it in presenting their case. But if you go on the witness stand and contradict that earlier statement, the court might let that original statement in as evidence to impeach your testimony. This is one of those exceptions that trips people up.

These examples make it clear that not every missed Miranda warning is a mistake. It depends a lot on the details of the situation, and knowing how this works might make a big difference.

Consequences of Not Being Read Miranda Rights

If your Miranda Rights weren’t read, it doesn’t always mean your case is dropped or that your statement gets excluded in court. The main thing to know is that those rights are about protecting you during police questioning after you’re in custody.

Let’s say you were taken to a police station and questioned without being read your rights. If you’re both in custody and under interrogation, that’s a problem. In that case, anything you said might be blocked from being used in the prosecution’s case against you.

But there’s that impeachment rule again. If you testify in court and say something that doesn’t line up with your earlier statement, even if that first statement was made without Miranda warnings, it could still be used to challenge your trustworthiness.

Also, if you were in custody but just started blurting things out and nobody was questioning you, Miranda doesn’t apply. Law enforcement does not have to stop you from talking. That kind of statement can still be admitted, especially if it wasn’t the result of an interrogation.

So while there may be limits on what can and can’t be used in court, not reading Miranda Rights doesn’t turn the legal process upside down. There are built-in exceptions, and courts look closely at how these situations went down.

What To Do If You Are Not Read Your Miranda Rights

If you believe your Miranda Rights should have been read and weren’t, it’s important to stay calm and take the right steps.

1. Stay Calm: Don’t panic or start arguing with officers. That won’t help you and might make things worse.

2. Request a Lawyer: You have the right to speak with an attorney. Ask clearly by saying, “I’d like to speak to an attorney.”

3. Use Your Right to Remain Silent: You don’t need to answer any questions without a lawyer. Make this clear and stick to it.

4. Stop Volunteering Information: You might feel tempted to explain things. Avoid doing that until you’ve spoken with your lawyer.

There’s no benefit to guessing how things will turn out or assuming your rights will be protected without speaking up. Use your legal protections and stay quiet until someone qualified can help.

Navigating Your Legal Journey with McKenzie Scott

Knowing how and when Miranda Rights apply gives you an important advantage during police interactions. These rules are there to protect you, but they don’t work on their own unless you know how to use them. From understanding the fine line between custody and a casual chat, to what counts as interrogation, there’s a lot that can impact your case.

If you ever find yourself unsure about whether your rights were respected, don’t guess or leave it up to chance. It’s always better to ask for a lawyer and get the help you need before saying anything.

Connect with McKenzie Scott, and get experienced insight into your unique situation. Our team is here to help protect your rights, guide you through the process, and stand by your side every step of the way.

If you find yourself in a tricky legal situation and are unsure about your rights, having the right support can make all the difference. Get in touch with a San Diego Criminal Defense Attorney at McKenzie Scott to make sure your rights are protected and your voice is represented. Our team is here to help you figure out your next step with clarity and support. Reach out to us to talk through your situation and get the help you need.

Watch our video on this topic here:

McKenzie Scott PC is a top-rated San Diego civil rights and criminal defense firm founded by Michele Akemi McKenzie and Timothy A. Scott – two former public defenders dedicated to “fighting for the little guy.”

Most people don’t think twice before hitting send on a work email. It’s just part of the daily grind, sharing updates, following up on tasks, confirming who’s handling what. But when your role includes decision-making or has any tie to public funds or corporate governance, that simple email could spark something bigger. Without realizing it, a business email message can be used to build a case of honest services fraud, turning a normal day into the start of a criminal investigation.

This charge may sound like legal jargon, but it carries real consequences. What starts as an internal dispute over ethics or a poorly worded message can suddenly become federal. And when you’re facing accusations of violating public or employment trust, especially in a place like San Diego where business and government lines often cross, the pressure can rise fast. Knowing how these cases take shape is key to avoiding a charge that hits hard on both your freedom and your career.

Understanding Honest Services Fraud

Honest services fraud deals with betraying someone’s trust. At the center is a relationship, typically between a worker and their company, or a public officer and the community they serve. If that worker or officer does something for personal reward while failing to look out for the people they’re supposed to serve, they could face federal charges. It doesn’t have to involve direct stealing. The accusation is that someone messed up the trust they were expected to protect.

For example, let’s say a city employee accepts gifts from a contractor and then quietly helps that company get a big contract. Or a company leader uses their position to approve deals that benefit their personal friends while skipping better offers from outsiders. These actions question whether they’ve been loyal to the people they work for and if they used their honest services the right way.

To prosecute this kind of case, the government looks at more than just what happened. They focus on intent. The key question is whether the person knowingly hid important information or did something dishonest that gave themselves or someone else an unfair edge. It doesn’t always come down to money either. Sometimes, it could be about giving someone a job, promising favorable treatment, or leaving out key facts in a decision-making process.

Prosecutors have to show that:

– There was a clear duty of trust between the person and whoever they were supposed to serve
– That duty was broken by dishonest action, like kickbacks, lying, or secret deals
– The dishonest behavior was meant to deceive or gain something unfair

Honest services fraud is often used in white-collar investigations, and while it may sound like a civil wrongdoing, it’s no light matter. It’s a criminal charge, and someone facing it can end up in court defending more than just their reputation.

How an Innocent Business Email Can Lead to Charges

Emails can be a goldmine for investigators and a trap for business leaders who underestimate how words can be twisted under pressure. Honest services fraud doesn’t always start with the classic red flags. Sometimes, it begins with a forwarded message or a quick deal closed over email that skips the usual process.

Here’s one example. A board member at a nonprofit replies to a colleague’s update, saying something like, “Let’s go with Dave’s group, he always looks out for us.” That doesn’t seem like a big deal. But if Dave’s group just happens to have close personal ties to the board member and there was a competing proposal that was more qualified, someone might raise questions. If that relationship wasn’t disclosed, or if that choice ended up costing donors more while benefiting friends, that casual email could land in a courtroom.

The problem is that email lacks tone and context. A loose line or quick suggestion can be dragged out in front of a jury. Later, investigators put together chains of emails, searching for patterns like favoritism, hidden perks, or knowledge someone kept quiet on purpose.

To keep clear of this kind of trouble, avoid these common email habits:

– Putting decisions in writing without background or context
– Using vague language like “hook him up” or “he’s one of us”
– Forwarding contacts or documents without following rules or process
– Avoiding official channels for contracts, donations, or hiring

Emails feel private, but they rarely are. When prosecutors build their story, they piece together all types of records to support their claim that someone broke the law on purpose. A single message might be the last puzzle piece they needed. That’s why thinking before you click send is more than just smart, it’s protective.

Legal Consequences And Defense Strategies

Honest services fraud isn’t something that ends with just a warning or a fine. Because it usually falls under federal law, the stakes are high. Someone found guilty could face time behind bars, probation, expensive fines, or even having their assets seized. And since this type of charge often involves allegations of corruption or backroom deals, the public fallout can be just as heavy. It can destroy a reputation, derail a business career, and sever trusted relationships.

Defense depends on the details. Since this charge hinges so much on intent, a strong defense often challenges what the prosecutors claim someone knew or meant to do. Sometimes, the email or communication in question was missing important background. Other times, the action someone took was clearly part of their job. Proving there was no hidden exchange of favors or personal gain can shift the weight in court.

Here are a few common defense approaches:

– Lack of intent: showing that an employee or official didn’t mean to deceive or that their actions followed normal routine
– No personal benefit: arguing there was no gain to the accused or that decisions were made to benefit the business, not just themselves
– Misinterpretation of communication: pointing out how language or context was twisted or taken out of scope
– Failure to establish duty of honest services: challenging whether there really was a duty between the person and the party claiming to be harmed

Even if federal investigators are still piecing things together, having legal support early can keep a case from picking up unwanted momentum. For those in public service or leadership roles in San Diego, even quiet whispers of fraud can quickly spiral. That’s why preparation matters just as much as defense.

Preventive Measures For Businesses

Avoiding honest services fraud charges begins with a culture of clear communication and ethical decision-making. When everyone knows what’s okay, what’s not, and where to go with concerns, there’s less room for lines to be crossed.

Here’s how to lower the chances of trouble:

1. Train your team

Educate employees at all levels about conflict-of-interest issues and disclosure rules. Many people break rules without realizing there are any.

2. Improve documentation

Keep written records of key decisions, bids, or contract awards. Clarity now can stop confusion later, especially when emails get pulled into review.

3. Use formal channels

Stick to official platforms for hiring, payments, and deal approvals. Avoid casual back-and-forth messages when formal processes are required.

4. Monitor vendor relationships

Stay aware of who your team interacts with and whether connections exist that should be disclosed.

5. Have a reporting structure

Give employees a clear way to report problems without risk of backlash. Early internal reporting is one of the best tools to head off bigger issues.

The key here isn’t to scare everyone into silence but to guide the business toward being direct and careful. Leaders carry the extra responsibility of making sure standards are followed and setting the right example. Taking shortcuts, even with good intent, can raise questions later.

What This Could Mean For Your Future

Honest services fraud charges aren’t reserved for politicians or top executives. Regular business owners, board members, and even office managers can be pulled into investigations if their actions or emails are misread as dishonest. These cases can move quickly and hit hard.

Once the feds start digging, everything becomes evidence, including meetings, memos, witness statements, and most often, emails. Dealing with the fallout is expensive and stressful, and it rarely stays behind closed doors. Public trust breaks fast when fraud is on the table.

If you’re dealing with this charge in San Diego or think you’re being watched, it’s time to act fast. The sooner you speak with a lawyer who knows how these cases take shape, the better your chances of pushing back with clarity and control. Prevention plays a big part, but when you’re already in deep, proper legal guidance could protect your freedom, your job, and your name.

If you’re facing charges or an investigation that involves misuse of trust or position, it’s important to act quickly. The right legal team can help protect your future. Speak with an honest services fraud lawyer in San Diego from McKenzie Scott who can defend your rights and guide you through the legal process with experience and care.

Introduction: Know Your Rights Before You’re Pulled Over

Being pulled over is never pleasant; it’s even more stressful when a police officer asks to search your vehicle. In San Diego and throughout California, there are specific legal rules that determine when officers can and cannot conduct a vehicle search. Understanding these rules can protect your rights, prevent unlawful searches, and help you navigate roadside encounters with confidence.

At McKenzie Scott PC, our San Diego defense attorneys – many of whom are former federal public defenders – have seen firsthand how police searches can result in overreach, intimidation, and even unlawful arrests. This guide will help you understand your rights, when you can legally say “no,” and what to do if you believe those rights were violated.

When Can San Diego Police Legally Search Your Car?

Under the Fourth Amendment, individuals are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures. That means law enforcement officers generally need a warrant or a legal exception to search your car. Here are the most common scenarios in which a car search may be considered lawful:

• Probable Cause: If an officer has probable cause to believe your vehicle contains evidence of a crime—such as seeing drug paraphernalia, smelling marijuana, or spotting an open container—they may legally search without a warrant.
• Consent: You can voluntarily allow the officer to search your car. However, you are not required to consent. If you say “yes,” anything found can be used against you. Always remember that if you are asked to consent to a search, that generally means you have the right to say “no.”
• Search Incident to Arrest: If you’re lawfully arrested, police may search areas of your car within your immediate reach, especially if they suspect it holds evidence related to the arrest.
• Vehicle Impoundment or Inventory Search: If your car is impounded, law enforcement is allowed to perform an “inventory search” to catalog the contents—this is done to protect against claims of theft or damage.

What Are Your Rights During a Traffic Stop in San Diego?

Even if the stop feels routine, you still have important constitutional rights. Here’s how to handle yourself during a police stop:

• Stay calm and respectful. Aggressive behavior or sudden movements can escalate the situation.
• You have a right not to incriminate yourself. You are generally not obligated to answer questions about where you’ve been or what you’re doing.
• Ask, “Am I being detained?” If the officer says “no,” you should be free to leave.
• Protect your rights and refuse the search. If asked to consent to a search of your car, you can simply say, “I do not consent to a search.” This phrase is powerful. It doesn’t guarantee the search won’t happen, but it helps preserve your legal options and may make any resulting search more vulnerable to challenge in court.

Understanding Consent Searches: Why “No” Is Often the Right Answer

Many drivers feel pressured to say “yes” when an officer casually asks, “Mind if I take a quick look in your trunk?” But if you are being asked to consent to a search, you may say “yes” to the search or you may say “no.”. Often, police will ask you to consent to a search when they do not have a warrant and when they know that no other exception to the warrant requirement applies.  In these circumstances, you may exercise your constitutional right to decline a search.

Here are some important points to remember:

• Consent must be voluntary. You cannot be coerced or threatened into saying “yes.”
• You can say “no.” If there’s no warrant or probable cause, refusal should prevent the search.
• Anything found during a consent search can be used against you. Saying “yes” limits your legal ability to challenge the search later.
• Keep in mind that “Do you mind if I look inside?” is not a legal command. It’s a request. And you are well within your rights to say “no” (politely and clearly).

What to Do If You Believe Your Rights Were Violated

Not every search follows the law. If you think a police officer in San Diego conducted an illegal search of your vehicle, it’s critical to take the right steps after the encounter:

• Document everything: Time, location, officer names or badge numbers, and what was said. Write down if you gave consent (or if you felt forced or misled).
• Gather witnesses: If anyone saw the stop, obtain their contact info.
• Keep paperwork: Citations, receipts, or impound forms.
• Call an experienced criminal defense attorney in San Diego: A knowledgeable lawyer can assess whether your rights were violated and whether evidence can be suppressed.

At McKenzie Scott PC, we help San Diego drivers understand their rights and fight back when those rights are ignored.

How to Protect Yourself During Police Encounters

Being informed is your best defense. Here’s a quick recap of how to handle a police search situation:

• Understand the conditions that make a vehicle search legal.
• Stay calm, silent, and respectful during any stop.
• Ask clearly, “Am I free to leave?”
• You have a right to say: “I do not consent to any searches” if asked.
• If something feels wrong, speak to a lawyer immediately.

Need Help After a Police Search in San Diego?

Whether you’re returning from work or just out for a drive, knowing your police search rights gives you the power to protect yourself. If your car was searched and you’re unsure if it was lawful, don’t guess. Get experienced legal help.

The attorneys at McKenzie Scott PC have decades of experience defending San Diego residents against unlawful searches and criminal charges. If your rights were violated, we’ll help you explore your legal options and fight back.

Contact us today for your free, confidential consultation.

On a weekly, and often daily basis, we hear from people incarcerated in this nation’s jails and prisons seeking help. We hear from people who are not receiving the medical care they need and who are terrified that they will suffer permanent injury from the jail or prison’s failures to properly provide necessary medical care (as they are constitutionally required to do), we hear from family members distraught over the beatings their loved ones are receiving in custody and desperate to find ways to help, we hear from people who have no access to potable water. And while we – a team of current justice warriors and former federal public defenders – want nothing more than to step in and help those who are too often unseen and unheard behind prison walls, the system makes it almost impossible to help.

It’s been over three years since the Prison Policy Initiative published “Slamming the Courthouse Door: 25 years of evidence for repealing the Prison Litigation Reform Act” by Andrea Fenster & Margo Schlanger. Ms. Fenster and Ms. Schlanger make a strong case for why the “reform” envisioned by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA) has only resulted in the “civil rights violations” happening in jails and prisons “never reach[ing] the public eye.” The report highlights how the PLRA came to life during “an era full of unfair, punitive, and racist criminal justice laws“.

For those of you unfamiliar with the PLRA, here is one example of how it effectively closes the courthouse door to injured detainees and prisoners. In order to even reach the merits of their claims, detainees and prisoners have to prove to the court that they have “exhausted” the administrative grievance process. Our local MCC San Diego explains the administrative grievance process to detainees in this way:

The Administrative Remedy Program is a process through which an inmate may seek formal review of issues related to their confinement. Prior to using the Administrative Remedy Program, you should initially attempt to resolve a problem informally through communication with a staff member, Inmate Request to Staff Member (copout) and Request for Informal Resolution. You should request a BP – 9 form, from your Correctional Counselor, if informal resolution proves unsuccessful. Once completed, the form should be returned to the Correctional Counselor who will deliver it, along with the proposed informal resolution, to the Administrative Remedy Coordinator. The deadline for completion of informal resolution and submission of the formal written Administrative Remedy Request, on the appropriate form (BP – 9), is 20 calendar days following the date on which the basis for the request occurred. The Warden has 20 calender days to respond from the day of filing. If you are not satisfied with the response to the BP – 9, an appeal may be filed, within 20 days, to the Regional Office, which has 30 days to respond. If you are not satisfied with the regional response, an appeal may be filed, within 30 days, to the General Counsel at Central Office, which has 40 days to respond. If the time period is not sufficient to make an appropriate decision, the time for response may be extended by 20 days at the institution level, 30 days at the regional level, and 40 days at the Central Office level. You will be notified of any extensions in writing by staff. The appropriate forms are available from your Correctional Counselor.

Huh? As someone with 20 years of formal education, I’m not sure I could properly comply with each and every step as laid out above. But if you do not complete each of these steps, and then pursue your claim all the way through the appellate process, you cannot pursue your claim in court. Or you can try, but your case will more likely than not be dismissed before what happened to you is even heard or considered by the court. If your cellmate looks deathly ill and cannot pursue a claim themselves, they’re out of luck because you can’t do it for them (28 CFR § 542.10 “An inmate may not submit a Request or Appeal on behalf of another inmate.”). We’ve acknowledged significant problems necessitating oversight of this nation’s prison system. It’s past time to reconsider the PLRA and to stop pretending that human rights violations affecting our brothers and sisters in custody are not our responsibility.

McKenzie Scott PC is a top-rated San Diego civil rights and criminal defense firm founded by Michele Akemi McKenzie and Timothy A. Scott – two former public defenders dedicated to “fighting for the little guy.”

Ninth Circuit recognizes “prison to homelessness pipeline, ” upholds (in part) Seattle ordinance forbidding landlords from adverse action based on criminal history.

This spring, the Ninth Circuit decided Yim v. City of Seattle, 63 F.4th 783, 787 (9th Cir. 2023), which despite being a Section 1983 case brought by landlords against the City of Seattle, is a refreshing acknowledgment of the devastating impact that even a single criminal conviction can have on a person’s ability to find housing for themselves and for their families.

The opinion starts with some sobering statistics:

• “formerly incarcerated persons are nearly 10 times as likely as the general population to experience homelessness or housing insecurity,” and;
• 1 in 5 people who leave prison become homeless shortly thereafter.

Yim, 63 F.4th at 787.

As Yim acknowledges, “this ‘prison to homelessness pipeline’ has a host of negative effects on communities. Persons without stable housing are significantly more likely to recidivate, with one study estimating that people with unstable housing were up to seven times more likely to re-offend. They are less likely to be able to find stable employment and access critical physical and mental healthcare. ” Id.

And these consequences are not borne equally by all community members:

• “Data from the Seattle Police Department show that Black persons are stopped at a rate that is 4.1 times that of non-Hispanic white persons and Indigenous persons are stopped a rate that is 5.8 times that of non-Hispanic white persons.”
• “While the overall population in King County, home to Seattle, is just 6.8% Black, the population of the King County jail is 36.6% Black.”
• Despite being approximately 7% of the population, Seattle’s unhoused community is 25% Black.

So the City of Seattle passed an ordinance prohibiting landlords for asking about criminal history for new or current tenants. It also prevented landlords from taking adverse action based on that information. Id. at 789.

The Ninth Circuit held that the while the ordinance violated the First Amendment in that it was not “narrowly tailored ” enough to survive constitutional scrutiny, Id. at 796-97, that landlords did not violate any “fundamental ” Due Process right held by the landlords. Id. at 798-99. Because the ordinance had a severability clause, the rest of the statute was presumptively constitutional, and the matter was remanded to the district court for further proceedings. Id. at 799.